Each one for me has + and - points1) Civic type R (2003/2004)
2) Leon Cupra R (2003/2004)
3) BMW 330Ci (2003)
4) Impreza WRX Blobeye (2003/2004)
5) Megane 225 (2003/2004)
Which one would you have and why?
Experience and taste tells me to give the 225 a wide birth. Its probably a good car, its probably a nice drive, its quick on paper, and the one you would buy will probably be 100% reliable. I even think its looks good, in a querky sporty sort of way. But Renault reliability is seriously questionable, they always score poor on customer satisfaction feedback, and Renault simply produce too many Friday afternoon cars to be serious consideration for me. Couple that with crap customer support (i've worked for a Reno dealer...) and they are out of a shout. Renault have and do build very good drivers and sporty cars, but its in history that most of them havent been the most notorious cars for reliability...5 GT Turbo - Whizz bang. Clio Williams - Tempremental and fickle lump. Clio 172/182 - Know far too many people who have bad things to say about ownership prospects. Why would the 225 be any different?What is wrong with the Megane?
Rated quite highly by Evo, though this is the Trophy version http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evolongtermtests/67652/renault_mgane_trophy.htmlHow can you be considering a Megane?! LOL.
Seriously any of the other cars mate, it all boils down to personal preference, but not a Megane, please!